Because of our expected popularity, we've moved to a larger location!

We're now at soberjones.blogspot.com

More parking spaces, and wide, luxury lanes. We'll see you there.

What's really wrong with Hillary?

I remember years ago reading an article stating that broken hips in the elderly were not caused by falls, but, rather, the falls were caused by broken hips. The hips would break because of some disease process, and the person would fall. Hillary is at an age where disease would beset her. And with Bill's past, she could have almost anything.

Disease and death is the great equalizer. Those who want to believe and follow the folly of liberalism accomplish several things that conservatives would never even attempt against them. They contribute to their own early deaths and disabilities, and they abort their young.

Government healthcare is inherently divisive

We have enough to hate each other over; do we really want to add to those things the question of what diseases get cured? what diseases get ignored? what behavior disqualifies one for health care? who gets health care and who doesn't? who lives and who dies? What do we do when political biases cause corruption that goes beyond mere theft, but actually causes the death or injury to those who don't agree with the bureaucrats in power? Along with all its other obvious problems, government healthcare is inherently divisive. It's bad enough dealing with government getting your car registered, imagine dealing with that same personality when it involves your health.

Seven abortion clinics shut down

According to a Worldnetdaily.com article, seven abortion clinics in El Paso, Texas are shutting their doors for lack of funding. This is one great thing about the impending collapse of the economy, liberalism is expensive, and it will be the first thing to go when the economy collapses. "Gay rights", abortion, "feminism", "women's rights", all take a back seat when survival and food become the issues. It wouldn't surprise me if the current regime brings about a depression so deep that the country reverts to a religious, tribal rule.

What if the president was a Rebublican, and the economy was like it is now?

As we move into Obama's sixth month in office, and almost a year of influence on the markets and other societal forces, I can't help but wonder what the liberals would be saying had a Republican been elected president with the same results. The world is falling apart, the markets are limping, and unemployment continues to climb toward record levels. Imagine if the president were Sarah Palin. They would be calling her all kinds of names and blaming her for everything that is going wrong, but not with Obama.

Well, thing will continue to get worse-- much worse. At some point the libs will start to critisize. Some already are critisizing, but they are bloggers that have little influence. If they had any real influence, they'd be fired.

"Open invitation here to meet me face to face so I can beat the shit out of you."

This was the response I received from a liberal who claimed to be gay in response to my point that homosexuals' biggest problem is not bigotry. Indeed, their problems start with their own behavior. I also pointed out that most gay bashing is done by other gays.

In response to his wanting to "meet me face to face so [he] can beat the shit out of me", I wrote:

As to the person who wants to "beat the shit out of me". You prove my point about who the violent individuals really are. Hopefully you have no children or wife, if so, Family Protective Services should probably look into their wellbeing.

He then responded:

No, asshole, I am not married and do hot (sic) have kids. I am GAY. And I'm tired of being dumped on by bigots like yourself. And yes, I'd love to show you what a gay man can do, namely kick your ass.

I pointed out that his threats are federal felonies. He wrote back and said he could "have worded it better." Bill Gates, are you listening? We need a new feature on word, it can operate like spell checker, it's called threat checker. It's for people who mistakenly type "I'm going to beat the shit out of you", when really what they mean is "I'm going to beat the shit out of you".

New feature-- Critique of the news anchors

I've spoken to the editors, and they think it's a great idea. I'm going to watch Katie Couric tommorow -- I know, it goes against my maxim, but this is for the cause of humanity. Then I'm going to expose her show for the boring, talentless waste of public airwaves that it is. Stay tuned.

I welcome your input.

Texas officials want investigation of gay bar raid

You've got to read this article. It's about how a county commissioner wants to be sure a group wasn't being singled out for prosecution - the group-- gays.

Where was this commissioner when CPS, known for being manned by lesbians and homosexuals, singled out religious organizations and conspired to deny them their rights?

The world has gone completely mad.

Oh, by the way, Michael Jackson was not a great man. If you think so, you need to read my article on delusion.

Michael Jackson should not be honored at all

The reason the media wants us to believe Michael Jackson was a great man is because he wasn’t a great man. He promoted through his music the very activities that are causing the great health care crisis we are going through today. And he profited from those activities.

If you notice, the inane TV shows you are addicted to are funded by two, main products: drugs, and trucks. The media wants you to be sick. It actually makes money by making you sick. Michael Jackson’s influence is responsible for many deaths, illnesses, broken families, and broken lives—including, it turns out, his own. He, of course, was not the mastermind behind his negative influence. He was more or less a sickly puppet on a string—a puppet that would have been better off in an insane asylum. He should not be honored at all.

Sotomayor overturned

What's significant about this case? Souter dissented. Therefore, Sotomayor will likely have no real impact on the makeup of court. Check back for legal analysis.

Uncle Tom's Cabin

Tune in tomorrow for my expose on the current occupant of Uncle Tom's Cabin.

Are you deluded?

As I was “debating” an issue with some liberals on a liberal blog, I couldn't help but notice the lack of rationale for their position. Indeed, they had no rationale, and were not even attempting to muster one. All they could mutter was insults—of me, whom they don’t even know. I began to seriously wonder, is that person drunk? Are they blogging from an insane asylum? What is the nature and character of their condition? Are they as physically violent as they are verbally violent? If so, are their children safe? Is their wife safe-- their husband? There seems to be many of them.

I remember years ago as a teenager working construction in a poor section of town. The apartments I was working on had gas stoves. And the stoves had vents. And because the stove in the unit I was working in had been removed, the vent was wide open. As I worked, I could clearly hear into the upstairs unit. All the occupants did was swear at each other and call each other names. That impoverished, angry, and insane segment of society now has the Internet, and some of them keep themselves occupied by swearing at others in the blogs. They hold positions, but no reason for them. And they refuse to listen to any logic.

I recently and accidentally ran across a word that defines the nature and character of this condition commonly displayed by liberals. The word is “delusional”. In psychiatry, the noun form is defined as a fixed false belief that is resistant to reason or confrontation with actual fact. Many liberals are delusional. And one cause of their condition is a difficulty they have distinguishing fiction from reality.

Shows like “Hung” glamorize the life of a male prostitute by omitting the realities of the "profession" such as early onset Alzheimer’s, testicle cancer, anal cancer, high tax-rates for everyone, anal cancer of the wife, blind babies, abortions, blurred vision, heart troubles, prostate failure, impotence, herpes, genital warts, liver disease, prison, bankruptcy from medical bills, early death, and other myriad problems that plague all prostitutes. Mention these omissions, and the deluded individual stubbornly resists the intrusion into his fraudulent view of reality. They are loyal to the delusion to the degree that they want to harm anyone shattering it-- sometimes by simple name-calling. They want others to share in the delusion. It is as if they are angry at reality.

So the answer to my question can be determined by whether you name-call in response to my articles.

If macho is dying, it's time for assisted suicide

The article in Salon begins “[w]hat centuries of feminist protest didn’t accomplish, the global recession will—the death of macho.

It’s easy to classify the Salon article as anti-men, but it is, more precisely, an illogical emotional outburst by one of those delusional protesting feminists, and it is generated by hatred for families. It celebrates the loss of jobs for men as if that somehow helps women—and maybe it does help pining, divorcees who sit at home making their living writing hate speech against men, but as a protesting feminist, you’d think the author would have considered that maybe those jobless men will simply take the women’s jobs. They are, after all, macho. Maybe they’ll become journalists.

Key to the article’s premise is the definition of “macho”. The article is, after all, about its death. Conveniently, the author defines it in the article. So we needn’t speculate. It is defined as "aggressive, risk-seeking behavior." Aside from the obvious grammatical problem with the definition being a noun and not an adjective, there is another problem. It defines liberalism.

Remember Barney Frank? I’m sure you do. He’s the congressman from Massachusetts who hired a male prostitute – hey, maybe that’s the basis for the new show Hung. Now that might be worth watching. Now I understand why it’s a comedy. Who would play Barney Frank? But I digress. Barney Frank, and others engage in, promote, and, indeed, legislate aggressive, risky behavior. So if macho is dying, it’s time to pull the plug.

What the country needs, a comedy about gigolos

In an apparent attempt to improve society by encouraging more male stars to get anal cancer -- to offset the sexist anal cancer of Farah, a new show targeting a liberal audience, and progressively named Hung, glamorizes male prostitution. It’s about a gigolo, of all things, a gigolo frequented by female clients – well, it is fiction. They can’t show what male gigolos really do—“not that there’s anything wrong with that.” Well, apparently there is, because their gigolo has no male clients. I haven’t watched the show, and probably never will, but from the advertisements, it seems the show portrays being a gigolo as an exciting career opportunity for young skulls full of mush. When society needs cops, they run cop shows, lawyers, legal shows, male gigolos—I think Hollywood has a conflict of interest. My guess is the show has few episodes covering the gigolo in his more ghonorreal moments – like hours on the toilet with massive diarrhea, bouts with lipodistrophy, hundred pound weight loss, not the kind you want, but the kind that brings you down to 60 pounds, the blindness of his children, his early onset dementia, and, of course, a slow, ugly death from anal cancer that has spread to his liver. It’s a comedy. Now that’s funny.

My censored Huffington Post comment

I tried to post this on the Huffington Post at Huffingtonpost.com, but it was censored by the state. I was pointing out how ironic it is that we are “mourning” the loss of Farrah Fawcett from anal cancer, and right next to our “mourning” article, there’s an article inviting us to “Watch: Bruno strips for Conan”.

In a few years we may be “mourning” Bruno, and those who follow him. One of these days it will hit you, sick means sick.